Showing posts with label TV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 07, 2015

TAM to BARC - Evolution in Progress!!

As I sat through the BARC presentation today when the new TV measurement system was revealed to the industry; it was a very happy feeling. It was a proud moment to be witness to such a significant step forward in the evolution of the media industry in India. The media industry has evolved extensively over the past decade to respond to the changes happening in the media consumption behaviour of the Indian consumer. 

Over the years, technological development in products has given us so many new and improved media formats which we can see in print, radio, television and most visibly in digital media. The advent of HD TV, DTH, IPTV, Hi-tech Print Technology, FM Radio, Mobiles, Smartphones, Tablets, Broadband, Interactive Outdoor and many many more has then led to a revolution in Content for these new formats. The media houses brought in new content, expanded across formats and improvised business models thus challenging the existing norms of advertising and media planning. 

Since then, Communication Planning too has been totally revamped in agencies and is far more elaborate encompassing the characteristics of the consumer, the brand and the intricacies of media with accountability at its core.

At the final frontier of this evolution is where the media measurement systems need to change to respond to all the changes above and that is what we are seeing happen now. The IRS has been renewed and now the TV measurement system is also taking on a new avatar. This will lead to further development of the craft  of media strategy, planing and trading and build increasing value in the media ecosystem.

The curtain-raiser that we witnessed today is not just about one research over another but, has to be seen in a far more broader sense. TAM was the messiah at one point of time and it has served the industry well but, as we discussed above, the media landscape has changed and TAM has probably not responded well enough to these changes and so has had to make way for BARC.

Of Course! there are going to be many schools of thought on the ratings that BARC delivers. TAM had its limitations and while BARC TV ratings are set to improve on these limitations; BARC ratings will have its own set of challenges and limitations too. Some will swear by the ratings while, some will contest them; some will revel in the new software while, some will want for the comfort of the old system; some will derive new learning from the fresh data while, some will get caught in its apparent flaws... but, with time all will find their own method to embed this new system into their business practices and move on. 

I will not evaluate the impact BARC will have on the industry on the basis of the TV ratings that it will deliver now or in the near future but on the design of BARC and on the future potential of BARC that its design empowers.

The construct of the BARC research is revolutionary. The distributed ownership; the federal approach to control of the system; the conjunction of multiple superlative services and technologies; the scope for scalability required for India and most importantly the potential to grow into a multi-media multi-platform system are the dimensions of BARC that ensure its long-term success.

The fact that BARC is based on the new NCCS system is great but, that is just a matter of its panel design. What makes BARC exemplary is its future-readiness which is a crucial need-gap in the media industry. I will dwell a little more on this aspect that will allow BARC to be far more responsive to the changing media landscape in the future.

The water-marking technology though a simple technique (theoretically) is inherent to the algorithm that the BARC system uses. I am not aware of the exact scope of the code embedded in the current water-mark but, it has the potential of building in  not only the Channel ID but far more information related to each element of the content being telecast such as the program ID, the ID of the TVC and much more. Water-Marking content with such ID codes can enable a totally automated measurement system for every element being telecast. 

Once this ID is embedded in the content then irrespective of when or on what media or format the content is played this code can be identified and hence can make BARC agnostic to the media and the format. This gives BARC the potential to provide measurement of the content on any kind of TV input signal and any digital device too -  such as Laptops, Tablets, Phones, etc. 

Of course! the challenge will be of setting up systems and regulations to ensure water-marking of content beyond TV Channels and of setting up a panel of (so called) meters for media formats other than Television. These two challenges are political as well as that of research design. Difficult but do-able. As this happens, we will realize that BARC should not be called only as a TV Measurement System but, a Universal Measurement System for audio-visual content. 

But, yes.. while, it was a good feeling seeing the BARC TV Research and realizing the new era in media measurement that it is heralding; I do realize that the next few months are going to be a period of intense work to redefine the TV Planning process and benchmarks. We will have to burn a lot of midnight oil as we transition from one system to another making decisions on crores of investments for our brands.

The key learning that is reiterated as we look at the TV research changing hands is that "Evolution is not a Choice" and if we dont evolve fast enough.....!!


To know more about BARC and its implications on media planning go on to the BARC website http://www.barcindia.co.in or send in your queries to me at premjeetsodhi@gmail.com.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Future of TV in India

The Campaign A-List has collated the responses of over 300 Senior Professional from the Media Industry. In a recent, blog post "A-List of Changes"  I discussed what are the changes that these professional seek from media and advertising. Here, I am presenting a review of what all do they specifically expect to change in Television.

Here, of course I am ignoring ideas that are too extreme (like - ban TV) or too difficult to digest (such as - add smells to TV). Of course! TV was one of the mediums that had the most variety of comments for its future. I have classified these comments in 5 broad categories, each concerned about the following:

  • The TV Technology
  • The Advertising on TV
  • TV Content
  • Pricing of TV Commercial Time
  • Research & Measurement for TV
The slide here illustrates the different comments received and hence gives a glimpse of the changes once can hope for in the future.


The A-List is most worried about the overdose of advertising. Hence, in the future of TV wants ad-free channels, limit commercial time, limit ad-durations, limit frequency of ads, zap commercials, stop TV tickers and logos on screen, and so on.  


Overall, in TV Technology the Media Seniors want to have 2-way communication on TV thus making it Interactive. Other wants are - digitization of Cable, making TV HD, Addressability for DTH. Yes, they also want to have a like/dislike button on TV for giving feedback on content and advertising.


In Content, the primary concern is for News Channels about paid news, anchors getting hysterical and dramatization of news.


The Creative people still have not had enough of indulgence in Television and are dreaming of having cheaper ad-rates so that they can make longer duration ads - since 30s is just not enough to tell a story.


TV Measurement as always is wanting - larger sample and better coverage but this time there is more concern about what we are measuring. Instead of TVRs, the A-List seeks to have TV Respect Points and TV Watchability Ratings. Advertisers want to go beyond CPRPs to Ad-effectiveness measures and Impact measures.


Interesting thoughts, which if materialized will certainly change TV for the better in the future. So, I sincerely hope that the A-List is able to bring in the changes that they seek - for if they cant then who else can !!!

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Breaking News - Who's First?


In the era of limited media - News used to wait its turn.

Breaking News on newspapers could only happen every morning, irrespective of when the news happened. In fact, if the news was of late the previous night, then the breaking news on newspapers could only happen the day after.

But, then - there was radio - samachar or kabarein or the news bulletin on Aakashwani/ Vividh Bharti used to lead in breaking news. Of course! all would still anxiously await the next morning newspaper (or catch the evening TV news) to read and understand the details.

Soon, this breaking news moved to Television. But, still it needed to wait for the news slot at specific times for Salma Sultana to finally break the news. It was a little over a decade ago (1998) when we got our first 24 hour news channel and "live - breaking news" became a reality.

Television, has ruled the "breaking news" for over a decade and this has built many a fortunes - but, the question is how long will this dominance of TV last?

Life has bee very eventful in the recent past in terms of the amount of breaking news on television - at times though one wonders if 'breaking news' is driving television or is it the other way round.

Anyways, I want you all to think over some of the significant 'happenings' in India. Can you think of some events - Pl try.. Anna Hazare, Delhi Bomb Blast, Delhi Earth Quake,  Release of Singham, India's dismal performance at London.. can you think of more..

Now, can you just go back to these events one by one and think back where from did you first come to know of these events ?
  • Newspaper - oh no! you really need to get up and smell the coffee :-)
  • Television - really? maybe?
  • Social Networking Sites - Of course!!
Breaking News has moved to the internet and especially to social media sites.

A news braodcaster has a big team and news agencies that feed them the news and enable them to respond to news-worthy happenings within minutes. However, imagine an army of lakhs of "Citizen Journalists" in different parts of India, inhabitants of the social networking sites, connected 24x7 to the internet - they pick up events and break the news within seconds!!.

  • Not only are they fast - they are more relevant to you - as in your network they are 'your type of people' and what is news for them is most likely news for you.  
  • There is no more the TV anchor with a big ugly looking mike asking people at the venue about their experience; instead - the experience is streamed live via tweets and posts bythe  multitudes who are a witness to the event.
  • It is not a qualified/ sorted/ filtered perpective of the braodcaster - but a candid view of the manner in which probably you would have interpreted yourself.
  • The Social Reporter is interactive and responsive - and the Social Networking space allows one to merge a number of views simultaneously from varying sources - direct or indirect.
Social Media is creating an eco-system that is up and awake 24x7 and is abuzz with breaking news - continuously.

Overall, this is 'breaking news' for the TV Channels that the days of breaking news on TV are limited and with the movement will also move the fortunes of many a channel whose focus has primarily been on 'breaking news'.

Yes, the reach of Social Netwokring Sites and Internet and Mobile is limited - so "TV will still rule for many years to come... "; This surely is one of the most short sighted statements I have made in this post :-) so pleaas ignore it and get ready for the shift very fast.

Even, within Social Media it has moved from FB to Twitter, flirted with some other networks too - the latest being Google + but in India currently Facebook is still the biggest "news breaker".